Effect of preseason training on the physical condition of young soccer players: analysis by demarcations

  • Daniel Hernández Sánchez Research Group Planning and Evaluation of Sports Training and Performance. Pontifical University of Salamanca. Spain.
  • Víctor Martín Research Group Planning and Evaluation of Sports Training and Performance. Pontifical University of Salamanca. Spain.
  • María Villa-del Bosque Research Group Planning and Evaluation of Sports Training and Performance. Pontifical University of Salamanca. Spain.
  • Javier Sanchez-Sanchez Research Group Planning and Evaluation of Sports Training and Performance. Pontifical University of Salamanca. Spain.
Keywords: Capacidad de repetir sprints, Período de preparación, Test, Detección de talento Repeated sprint ability, Preparation period, Test, Talent detection Capacidade de repetir sprints, Período de preparação, Teste, Detecção de talentos

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the effect of preseason training on the physical condition of young players according to the playing position occupied in the field.

Method: The study involved 31 young soccer players (age: 15.5 ± 0.7 years; height: 174.4 ± 6.3 cm; weight: 62.4 ± 13.4 kg; experience: 8.5 ± 1.3 years) who were divided into three groups based on their playing position: central defenders and forwards (CD-FW, n = 13), central midfielders (CM, n = 6) and external defenders and external midfielders (ED-EM, n =12). At the beginning (M1) and at the end (M2) of a preseason period of 6 weeks all the players performed physical condition tests: intermittent endurance test (30-15VFIT), repeated sprint test (RSAmean and RSAbest), horizontal jump test (THbilateral), speed test (sprint 40 m) and change of direction test (T-Test).

Results: The results showed better values in THbilateral for CD-FW and ED-EM that for CM in both M1 (5/4/92%, likely and 99/1/0%, very likely, respectively) and in M2 (5/7/88%, likely and 97/2/1%, very likely, respectively). In the M2 measure, better results were also observed in ED-EM than CD-FW in the variables RSAmean (5/8/87%, likely), RSAbest (2/8/90%, likely) and T-Test (2/10/82%, likely).

Conclusions: While at the beginning of the training period there are only differences between demarcations in THbilateral, the specific training can cause differences between demarcations in the ability to repeat sprints and in the ability to change direction.

Published
2019-07-15
Section
Originals
Page/s
348-353