Laboratory VO2max versus Course Navette. An agreement study on physically active subjects.

  • Jose Ramon Alvero Cruz Andalusia TECH. School of Medicine of Physical Education and Sports. School of Medicine. Malaga University. Spain.
  • José Francisco Vico Guzmán Andalusia TECH. School of Medicine of Physical Education and Sports. School of Medicine. Malaga University. Spain.
  • Miguel Angel Moya Medina I.E.S. The Rosaleda. Malaga. Spain.
  • Margarita Carrillo de Albornoz Gil Andalusia TECH. School of Medicine of Physical Education and Sports. School of Medicine. Malaga University. Spain.
  • Jerónimo Garcia Romero Andalusia TECH. School of Medicine of Physical Education and Sports. School of Medicine. Malaga University. Spain.
Keywords: Consumo Máximo de Oxígeno, Course Navette, Concordancia Maximal oxygen uptake, Course Navette, Agreement Consumo máximo de oxigênio, Teste de Navette, Concordância

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to verify the agreement between the estimated value of VO2max, from the Course Navette, (VO2CN), compared with the direct measurement of oxygen consumption in laboratory (VO2LAB) in a group of young people of both sexes.

Methods: The study involved 28 physically active subjects (19 males and 9 women) of 20.5 ±   2.1 years old, eight: 67.1 ± 11.9 kg, height: 171.0 ± 8.5 cm, BMI: 22.8 ± 2.5 kg/m2. The VO2max for all participants was determined by the direct method in the laboratory with a graded test (VO2LAB) and by means of the estimation of the course Navette Test (VO2CN) with a maximum interval of one week between tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were performed to assess associations between variables and a Bland-Altman test to asses agreement between the values of VO2LAB and VO2CN.

Results: A significant correlation between VO2LAB and VO2CN was found (r = 0.53; IC95% (0.19 to 0.75), p = 0.003). Average values of VO2LAB of 46.1 ± 6.7 mL/kg/min and 47.23 ± 6.1 mL/kg/min for VO2CN are obtained, not presenting statistical differences (p = 0.21). The concordance analysis of Bland-Altman found no bias (difference: 1.4889 ml/kg/min (-0.895 to 3.8727), p = 0.21) and proportional error VO2LAB and VO2CN (Ƭ=-0089 (-0.33 to 1.89), p = 0.481). There are differences in the VO2LAB between men and women (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The values of VO2LAB and VO2CN present low-moderate correlation coefficients between methods, however the estimation of maximum oxygen consumption by the Course Navette test is an appropriate method in young subjects physically active, without differences in the average values, nor proportional error, although it is observed broad limits of concordance.

Key words: Maximum oxygen consumption, Course Navette, concordance.

Published
2019-03-15
Section
Originals
Page/s
221-225